Is Rule by Globalists Really a Thing?
Or are we all just "cookers" and conspiracy theorists?
💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘
Earlier at RAA we covered the dangerous proposed globalitarian amendments to the World Health Organisation (WHO) structure.
As a reminder, Australia would have been much better off had we ignored EVERYTHING the WHO told us about the pandemic:
WHO told us that the virus CAME FROM A BAT in a wet market, and definitely not from a lab leak.
WHO told us to quarantine ASYMPTOMATIC well people, not just the sick, for the first time in history.
WHO told us to LOCKDOWN, with no calculation of the many overall harms to society as a whole, ignoring everything epidemiologists knew about the futility of lockdowns and border closures against virus spread prior to 2019.
WHO told us that MASKS were effective.
WHO told us that SOCIAL DISTANCING worked (they never even bothered to try to show us the science behind it, because there is none).
WHO told us to apply policies to EVERYONE, not just to the vulnerable (the Covid risk under age 20 is so small as to be unmeasurable. Sorry, kids, no school for you).
WHO told us that NATURAL IMMUNITY did not provide enough protection.
WHO told us that the VACCINES prevent spread.
WHO told us that the vaccines were SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.
The peril of letting PROFESSIONAL CIRCUS ENTERTAINERS like these dictate policies that cost us hundreds of billions of dollars is clear.
Yet despite this absolutely laughable performance, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wrong last week gifted the WHO another $100M of your money:
Nevertheless, GLOBALISM sometimes still feels a bit hypothetical, a bit abstract, and a bit removed from our daily lives.
But globalitarian rule is not just felt globally or nationally, it is also felt locally.
Enter lates calcarifer, otherwise known as the humble Barramundi:
Many of you would likely recognise this prime Australian fish in another form:
Australia relies on Fisheries Research & Development reports to guide our fishing quotas and policies.
As they state on their website, they do this in order to stay within the rules prescribed for us by the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals:
And a quick check on the site shows Australia’s barramundi fishery to be in very good shape indeed, according to these U.N. rules:
So everything’s going well, right? Wong.
The Canberra professional circus entertainers popped their heads up again this past June.
This time it was globalitarian enforcer Tanya Plibersek.
Mme. Plibersek announced via press release that she was ending the barramundi gill-netting industry.
There was:
Zero consultation with the fishing industry or state and local governments;
Zero Parliamentary debate or advance notice; and
Zero scientific justification.
With the simple stroke of a press release, Tanya ended this multi-million dollar fishery, effective 31 December.
The interests of Australians and the interests of bureaucrats living in Geneva can sometimes coincide. But when push comes to shove, Tanya can be counted on to side with Geneva.
So whether it’s on energy, aboriginal affairs, or the environment, Tanya faithfully represents the wishes of her actual bosses. In Geneva.
Hook, line, and stinker
It turns out that Tanya’s intermediate boss Anthony Albanese, who somehow cannot not seem to manage the country of Australia without making 59 trips abroad in 18 months, had secretly cut a deal with UNESCO 12 months earlier.
The U.N. groups telling Australians how they must live were worried about the state of the Great Barrier Reef.
They instructed Albanese to “do something”, or else they would put the Reef on the “endangered” list:
This extortion would hurt the Australian tourism industry, so young Anthony did as he was told. This profitable and sustainable barra fishery was deep sixed.
The surprised fishos then asked “WTH is going on? After all, we’ve all got mortgage payments to make”.
“How can our fishery possibly hurt the Reef? It’s 80 kms away from where we fish”.
A gang of 19 UNESCO scientists eventually responded:
Dear hardworking fishermen of Queensland; Your dreaded fishes are carbon-based life-forms. But we are embarked on The Great War On The Weather, because we think (absent evidence) that carbon dioxide (the very basis of life on Earth) is going to kill us all. So you may no longer harvest these fishes, because they have, like, carbon in them, doncha know. Besides, our salaries are paid by a few dozen billionaires, and they are making serious bank just on the fact that Earth’s climate changes over time. Have a nice day.
Houston, we have a problem
When our PM and Treasurer cannot seem to prepare the nation’s budget without flying off to London for 3 days first;
When unelected aristocrats at U.N. dinner parties can dictate rules about who may eat and who may not on the other side of the globe:
We definitely have a problem.
And we also have a very simple solution: AUSTRALIA FIRST
💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘💪💓🦘
Update: November 2023
The U.N. First agenda is in full swing here in Australia.
The U.N.’s Labor Party enforcers have now added another species to the list of those that are much more important than human beings in Australia:
The Maugean Skate
This lowly creature was first identified as a separate species in 1988, exists only in Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour, and consists of a total of roughly 800 individuals.
But according to globalitarian superclown Tanya Plibersek, those 800 individuals are more deserving of survival than the $1.5 billion dollar Australian salmon industry.
More than a bunch of clowns, they are evil.
stopworldcontrol.com