Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shane Pisani's avatar

Great article, but a few challenges:

- the assumption that the money printing was to address covid or net zero seems false. This was the propaganda, sure, but no real evidence exists that this was genuine. The reverse seems more likely: covid was staged to address a desire to print money, depopulate, advance a bioweapon program, or related nefariousness.

- Portugal and Holland have not completely reversed policies on drugs.

- Digital ID propaganda is that it improves security and you have robustly argued it cannot. Yet that seems a limited hangout. The real threat, confirmed by policy documents, whistleblowers, and out in the open planning, is for digital ID to form part of a population control grid, including vax passports, social credit scores, collective punishment, smart contracts with cbdc's, 'smart cities', etc. This already existed on a smaller scale in Australia for many years. Eg. for those protecting children from the harms of the childhood vax schedule, both parents and kids were/are second class citizens, unable to access childcare, healthcare, taxed higher etc. All recorded on a centralised, digitised system.

Expand full comment
Jan DAWE's avatar

Centralising anything is always a bad idea. Having all your eggs in one basket is inviting trouble. Also they have no place in knowing anything about you. They are public servants and are supposed to be working for us and should be transparent as we are paying them.

Jan

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts